Halloween Masks
Crowd Size
Lawn Signs
Bill's Sources
We use only the most rigorous, empirically proven formulas for who will win the presidency. Specifically, we only use the models proposed by the once-in-a-generation mind of Bill Mitchell.
Always heard that yard signs were a great measure of who was really winning. Now that Trump is dominating that, no longer matters. #smh
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 5, 2016
The media is funny. They swear a sample of 500 in a poll hand-picked by Liberals represents 250 million but a crowd of 30k means nothing.
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 22, 2016
I have sources on the ground in OH. Trump is way ahead there. Trust me.
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 22, 2016
Halloween mask sales have predicted every Presidential winner since 1980. Right now, Trump masks lead Hillary by 30%.
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 22, 2016
A number of liberal Hi-liar-y pollsters like Nate Cohn and Harry Enten have tried to make fun of Bill, but he's stood up to them.
In the spirit of Halloween and knowing how predictive mask sales are of election results, I finally have my costume! pic.twitter.com/IPoTk3wbsC
— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) October 23, 2016
Clinton has an advantage in every model, except Bill Mitchell's Halloween costumes indicator @jackhealyNYT pic.twitter.com/RX3aB0W4rs
— Nate Cohn (@Nate_Cohn) October 23, 2016
I'm not the one who made costumes 100% accurate since 1980. https://t.co/0jmmh8CsBl
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 24, 2016
Why listen to him, not the polls? Because the polls can't be trusted. They use oversampling to skew polls, and oversampling is definitely what Bill says it is.
Imagine polls don't exist. Show me evidence Hillary is winning?
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) August 8, 2016
Does oversampling Democrat matter? Trump won Independents in the YouGov poll by 15 points yet LOST THE POLL!!!
— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) October 10, 2016